Investigating the current state and future of global e-commerce supply chains
This post is part of a five-part Field Study by Alpaca exploring the current state of global e-commerce supply chains and the opportunities we see ahead. Use these quick links to read the entire series: Part 1: Global Supply Chains, Part 2: Delivery, Part 3: Cross-Boarder, Part 4: Returns, Part 5: Conclusion.
Buon Giorno dall’Italia! It took some time to get Part 3 written this summer (see Part 1 and Part 2), but now I am sipping espresso in my family’s house on the Amalfi Coast thinking about a supply chain issue I have experienced most of my adult life having a multi-national family: cross-border logistics.
Una storia: Half of my family lives in Italy, so gift-giving has always been tough, especially for Christmas. My littlest sister, Emanuela, adores American culture and desperately follows the Biebers and the Kardashians on social media, not unlike many GenZ here who aspire to American pop culture royalty.
A couple of years ago when it launched, all Emanuela wanted was Kylie’s lip kit (for those living under a rock, Kylie Jenner’s beauty brand Kyle Cosmetics catapulted her to be named the youngest self-made billionaire in 2019). There was an issue, though: my sister couldn’t get a lip kit shipped to her in Italy.
This doesn’t make sense, though, right? An international fan, who knows and loves the Kylie brand and is willing to pay, found it nearly impossible to get the items she wanted delivered. So I took it upon myself to be a good older sister and paid nearly $100 in shipping and customs to send her a $30 lip kit much to her surprise and delight. Here in lies the problem and opportunity of cross-border logistics.
With the rise of social media and the now 50 million creators globally, it is easier than ever to discover interesting content and commerce from all corners of the earth. The rise of K Beauty serves as a standout example of this trend for me. There is a halo effect, in particular, for US brands shucked by internationally recognized celebrities like Bella Hadid, Emily Ratajkowski, The Kardashians, and Kanye West (just to name a few) who help people all over the globe discover the latest lifestyle and beauty trends.
“Consumers have changed their behavior and how they connect with brands. They find them on Instagram, Snap, and Facebook now.”
Rathna Sharad, Founder & CEO @ FlavorCloud
However, if you’ve ever ordered something from an international store and dealt with customs delays or a lack of end-to-end tracking information, then you probably know cross-border e-commerce has room for improvement. As the world becomes more global, so must the e-commerce supply chain. So, why is cross-border selling so painful?
Customs, logistics, returns and managing the customer expectation are all more difficult when shipping internationally. A few reasons why:
“The big unlock [for cross-border] is making it not painful…brands who sell only 10% abroad will just drop international orders because of the pain [to facilitate those sales and because] it’s a marginal part of their business”
Passport Co-Founder Aaron Schwartz
A recent study by Visa revealed that 87% of e-commerce executives see cross-border sales expansion as the area with the most growth potential. Despite that, most companies do not sell internationally.
Now more than ever, brands need to figure out how to unlock global e-commerce. Why? For one, competition is at an all-time high because startup costs for an online brand are at a low. For example, in 1999, the average cost to build an e-commerce site was $100,000 (excluding inventory purchases, warehousing, and shipping logistics). Today it’s closer to $30, thanks to platforms like Shopify. With more brands starting up all over the world, e-commerce penetration is close to 65% globally.
With a glut of brands saturating the market, it has also become harder and harder to find customers and compete on price. Besides TikTok, in our current marketing environment, there is little-to-no acquisition arbitrage left. Facebook, Amazon and Google properties are more expensive than ever post iOS14. Brands need to find new avenues and locations to sell product, especially if they are not the cheapest alternative.
That said, the top reason online shoppers in the US shop internationally is lower prices. Younger generations are more price-sensitive and have a lower spending power than Boomers, which explains why international fast fashion brands like SHEIN, Romwe, Missguided, and Boohoo are so popular. Most of these brands serve the US market by shipping from an international fulfillment center to one within the US and are notorious for delivery delays and poor customer service. Customers are willing to undergo the online ordering pain for low prices on trendy clothes.
Cross-border e-commerce is growing at 2x the rate of domestic eCommerce per Accenture. Even as of last week, Pinduoduo, a social commerce platform aggregating buyer demand, announced its US expansion plans. In order to remain competitive, US brands must think without borders and compete on brand equity and super customer experience.
The order threshold to start considering global sales is around $10 million GMV. I know this first hand: I founded Bow & Drape, the cult favorite women’s mass customization brand, and internationalization proved incredibly difficult for us in the beginning. We had 15% of our site traffic from countries like Canada, the UK and Australia, but fulfilling to those customers was challenging (not to mention, at the time, we had built a custom checkout using Braintree and so had to build our own internationalization at checkout — y’all have it easy now with Shopify + GlobalE!). Doing it ourselves resulted in inefficient customer service, but finding international 3PLs that would scale with us also proved difficult. Most 3PLs were focused on enterprise-level brands (>$100M in revenues). We actually ended up using the help of HBC in several cases and piggy-backed off their importer networks.
Brands $10M+ have relatively few options to quickly start selling abroad:
When it comes to cross-border shopping, the “consumer experience needs to feel like you are buying locally, even though you’re not.”
Rathna Sharad, Founder and CEO of FlavorCloud.
Many of the startups that we’ve seen who are trying to unlock cross-border sales focus on a point solution for a given part of the supply chain, such as fulfillment, customs, or local payments. Below, we are cataloguing a few of the current solutions that help brands scale internationally:
We see an opportunity for end-to-end software solutions to help brands from Day 0. It would be great to see more software that helps to localize the e-commerce experience for international shoppers, with features that help to localize merchandising, marketing, and browsing. We’d also be interested in any companies that help smaller brands scale internationally, perhaps by bundling orders for international shipping and fulfillment.
Drop-shipping could be a cost-effective way to facilitate cross-border sales and we haven’t seen a lot of solutions that are doing this. Brands like Italic ship direct from manufacturer to locations around the world. We wonder if a software solution could unlock drop-shipping for other brands in a similar way.
Next, we’ll close out this 4-part Field Study series by discussing the last global supply chain opportunity we cataloged over the course of our year of research into the Global Supply Chain: end-to-end solutions for e-commerce returns and circularity. Enjoy your final days of summer — we’ll be back with more soon!
Our request: if you know entrepreneurs or industry experts exploring this space, please reach out to [email protected]. We love talking about this stuff and are looking to invest.
To keep up with the latest from Alpaca VC, connect with us on Twitter, Instagram, and LinkedIn @alpacavc, subscribe to our bi-weekly newsletter The Rundown here, or by reaching out directly to [email protected].
Disclaimer: Alpaca VC Investment Management LLC is a registered investment adviser with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Information presented is for informational purposes only and does not intend to make an offer or solicitation for the sale or purchase of any securities. Alpaca VC’s website and its associated links offer news, commentary, and generalized research, not personalized investment advice. Nothing on this website should be interpreted to state or imply that past performance is an indication of future performance. All investments involve risk and unless otherwise stated, are not guaranteed. Be sure to consult with a tax professional before implementing any investment strategy. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Statements may include statements made by Alpaca VC portfolio company executives. The portfolio company executive has not received compensation for the above statement and this statement is solely his opinion and representative of his experience with Alpaca VC. Other portfolio company executives may not necessarily share the same view. An executive in an Alpaca VC portfolio company may have an incentive to make a statement that portrays Alpaca VC in a positive light as a result of the executive’s ongoing relationship with Alpaca VC and any influence that Alpaca VC may have or had over the governance of the portfolio company and the compensation of its executives. It should not be assumed that Alpaca VC’s investment in the referenced portfolio company has been or will ultimately be profitable.
COPYRIGHT © 2024 ALPACA VC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LLC – ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. All logo rights reserved to their respective companies.
*Required. We look forward to sending you Alpaca's The Rundown newsletter, occasional updates and event invites.